Has this been addressed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Presumably, the "is_superuser" parameter was intended to make the updating > > of psql's prompt more accurate when SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION is used. > > However, if the prompt is customized to include the user name (%n), then > > the prompt changes to reflect the real superuser status, but does not > > change the user name. I guess we need to pass "session_user" as well. > > Seems reasonable. IIRC the only addition needed to the server code is > to set a flag in the variable's GUC entry. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
