Is this a bug?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 12:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > This this a TODO? Keep in mind if we follow the syntax of VACUUM and
> > > (7.4) CLUSTER, that the all-database truncate would just be "TRUNACATE".
> > > That seems very risky to me. I wonder if the risk is worth adding this
> > > feature.
> >
> > I wouldn't care for that either. The prior suggestion of "TRUNCATE tab
> > CASCADE" (to truncate any tables with FK dependencies on the original
> > target, instead of failing) seems more reasonable.
> >
>
> Actually there seems to be an ancillary issue here:
>
> 21809=# truncate exception;
> ERROR: TRUNCATE cannot be used as table exception_notice_map references
> this one via foreign key constraint $1
> 21809=# TRUNCATE exception_notice_map ;
> TRUNCATE TABLE
> 21809=# truncate exception;
> ERROR: TRUNCATE cannot be used as table exception_notice_map references
> this one via foreign key constraint $1
> 21809=# select count(*) from exception_notice_map;
> count
> -------
> 0
> (1 row)
>
> 21809=#
>
> Robert Treat
> --
> Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
