"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gaetano Mendola wrote: > > "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I see other strdup() calls that don't check on a return. Should we deal > > > with those too? > > > > Well strdup obtain the memory for the new string using a malloc > > and normally is a good habit check the return value of a malloc. > > Right. My point is that we have lots of other strdup's in the code. > Should we fix those too? Seems we should be consistent.
Shall I post the patch for SetVariable ? I know that this change is not so important but I want to try on my skin the cycle seen somethink wrong => send patch => be applyed Regards Gaetano Mendola ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
