Dann Corbit wrote:
You are making an assumption that the follwing sentence is only valid
under conditions of the first. That is nowhere stated. That connection
is only implied by your interpretation.
Not at all. the phrase "This means" clearly refers to what went before.
Even a trivial and absurd lawsuit can have disastrous consequences. Consider SCO verses IBM.
Fine. You sit quaking with fear in your boots. I won't. BTW, according to my legal theory *I* own all the code to Postgres. Bizarre? Sure, but don't let that stop you worrying about it.
One more thing - there is a Cygwin port of Postgres that *is* linked against Cygwin libraries - I haven't heard anybody suggesting that that has infected us with GPLing the code.
Let's get real.
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
