Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > As part of my spinlock testing, I noticed that we test for __cpu__ when > > using gcc, and __cpu when not using gcc. However, I see that my i386 > > gcc 2.95 defines both (shown using src/tools/ccsym): > > gcc only documents the __foo__ version, so there is a small reason to lean > in that direction if you want to make it uniform.
Oh, that helps, so my logic of testing for only __foo__ on gcc, and both when the compiler isn't gcc or isn't known is correct. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
