Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I require you to explain me why you committed the change
> > with no discussion and little investigation.
>
> If you want an apology for not having discussed it in advance, I'll
> gladly offer one. It was poorly done.
Thanks.
> I do, however, think that the reindexing code needs work. Can we
> get on with discussing the technical issues?
OK but I would need some time to remember the code.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
- [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long) Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexes (l... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexe... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system in... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexe... Kurt Roeckx
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system in... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexes (l... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexe... Gaetano Mendola
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system in... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for syste... Gaetano Mendola
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexes (l... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexe... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system in... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system in... Alvaro Herrera
