Tom Lane wrote:
(B>
(B> Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
(B> > The simplest senario(though there could be varations) is
(B>
(B> > [At participant(master)'s side]
(B> > Because the commit operations is done, does nothing.
(B>
(B> > [At coordinator(slave)' side]
(B> > 1) After a while
(B> > 2) re-establish the communication path between the
(B> > partcipant(master)'s TM.
(B> > 3) resend the "commit requeset" to the participant's TM.
(B> > 1)2)3) would be repeated until the coordinator receives
(B> > the "commit ok" message from the partcipant.
(B>
(B> [ scratches head ] I think you are using the terms "master" and "slave"
(B> oppositely than I would.
(B
(BOops my mistake, sorry.
(BBut is it 2-phase commit protocol in the first place ?
(B
(Bregards,
(BHiroshi Inoue
(B http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/
(B
(B---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
(BTIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
(B joining column's datatypes do not match
