On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > As an update, so far I still am getting better results with NOT EXISTS
> > than the left join.
>
> Hm.  Don't suppose you were using EXPLAIN ANALYZE so we could see what's
> happening?  This is clearly a planner failure, although I'm unsure if we
> can expect the planner to get the right answer with no pg_statistic entries.

For the sort+seq one and the not exists, I had, but I'll re-run it (it's
on my home desktop that I won't be able to access).  The other when I
forced it to use an index scan I haven't let complete yet, and I don't
know how long that will take.

I was also planning to run a set after running analyze, so I'll include
those too.  It'll probably be a few hours before the results are in. :)

Are there any other options (enable_mergejoin, etc) that you want me to
try with?



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to