Added to TODO:
* Allow more ISOLATION LEVELS to be accepted, but issue a
warning for them
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think we could allow users to set the transaction isolation level to
> > READ UNCOMMITTED or REPEATABLE READ and internally behave like READ
> > COMMITTED or SERIALIZABLE, respectively. The SQL standard seems to allow
> > this:
>
> My reading is that the spec *requires* this. We have not done it
> because there was some feeling that people would be confused if the
> isolation levels appeared to exist but didn't really work as they
> expected. But a notice or something could help address that concern.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
