Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > Nope, not for those items. There is still some thought of a very short > > release cycle (a few months) for 7.5, and we could possibly address the > > vacuum issue in that timeframe, if the recent ideas about it prove out. > > But there is no consensus on how to fix the integer-index issues, and > > I'm not willing to hold 7.4 (or even 7.5) hostage to finding one. > > The idea of very short release cycle for 7.5 is interesting. What is > the core's decision for point-in-time-recovery? Maybe the decision is > 7.5 does not include point-in-time-recovery?
I believe we were thinking PITR or Win32, or both could trigger a short 7.5 release cycle. However, it doesn't seem either is ready. If we do a short cycle, will we have enough features to justify a release? We could try to get PITR and Win32 done by January 1 and see if that can happen. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
