On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Marc G. Fournier writes: > > > That is the usual goal *nod* Same goal we try for each release, and never > > quite seem to get there ... we'll try 'yet again' with 7.5 though, as we > > always do :) > > I don't see how we could have tried for a 4-month development period and > ended up with an 8-month period. Something went *really* wrong there. > Part of that may have been that few people were actually aware of that > schedule.
Everyone on -hackers should have been aware of it, as its always discussed at the end of the previous release cycle ... and I don't think we've hit a release cycle yet that has actually stayed in the 4 month period :( Someone is always 'just sitting on something that is almost done' at the end that pushes it further then originally planned ... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
