On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Is there demand for this syntax:
>
> ALTER SEQUENCE ON table(col) CYCLE 100;
>
> It would allow us to become sequence-name independent...
The above is an operation that would not help me a lot, but a way of
performing currval() without knowing the sequence name would be good.
--
/Dennis
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
