Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > [moved to hackers / win32] > > Claudio Natoli wrote: > > >Or do people have strong leanings towards "fix as you go along"? Just feels > >like that way could see us getting bogged down making things "perfect" > >instead of advancing the port... > > > > > > > > w.r.t. Win32, I think the way to proceed is (in this order): > . make it work > . make it elegant > . make it fast > > BTW, I agree with Bruce, you're doing excellent stuff. Now for the fun > part (signals).
Actually, no. I thought fork/exec would be a real mess (as did Tom), but Claudio has done an excellent job of producing a minimal patch. The work isn't done yet, but this small patch has taken us much closer, so I assume signals will be even easier. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
