Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:OK, that makes more sense now. But why isn't table2 also in the rule query's rtable?
It is, but you errored out before getting to it.
The fog has finally started lifting, I think.
Why wouldn't we force checkAsUser to the rule owner in the copied RTEs, similar to the rest of the rule query? It makes sense in that the rule query could possibly use the RTE (although as you pointed out it doesn't in this case), and therefore the permission check should be the same, no?
Joe
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
