Manfred Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Wouldn't help anyway, if some other part of the app also calls kerberos.
>>
> That's why I've proposed to use the system from openssl: The libpq user
> must implement a lock callback, and libpq calls it around the critical
> sections.
... and if the rest of the app doesn't all adopt the same rule, you're
still screwed. Not a big step forward.
I'd also expect that anytime someone gets their callback wrong, we will
get the bug report. I don't think that a system in which people "must"
implement their own locking primitives is desirable.
> Attached is an untested prototype patch. What do you think?
Personally I find diff -u format completely unreadable :-(. Send
"diff -c" if you want useful commentary.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
