Marc G. Fournier writes: > I think at this late stage in the game (almost 10 years), changing could > be a bit difficult and confusing, no? :) I'd go with something like > pgsqld myself though, keeps it short ... or we could go even shorter with > just pgd ... > > But, I'm not, in any stretch of the imagination, advocating for change on > this ...
If it's ever going to happen then the likely place would be in a Linux distribution or a re-package of PostgreSQL. I'm sure no one would be suprised if Red Hat had a new release with dbd, ~db, sql (or keeping PostgreSQL in it pgsqld, ~pgsql, pgsql)... Indeed a lot of the current inconsistencies are packaging issues... L. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
