On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > So, what I'd like to do is make btree index creation pay attention to > vacuum_mem instead of sort_mem, and rename the vacuum_mem parameter to > some more-generic name indicating that it's used for more than just > VACUUM. Any objections so far?
Why not create a seperate index_mem variable instead? index creation tends to be, I think, less frequent then vacuum, so having a higher value for index_mem then vacuum_mem may make sense ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
