Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Right. And if we have sessionids we would want them logged there, I > > think. And that would rule out anything based on xid or backend pid. > > Uh, what's wrong with backend pid? Since we fork before we start doing > anything with a connection, it should surely be available soon enough > for the connection log message. > > Larry's idea about combining PID and backend start time didn't sound too > unreasonable to me.
Wow, like the idea too --- pid plus time_t start time of backend. Actully, it would be good to have star time first so you can sort everything in order of start time. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
