None at the moment, but I'm open to suggestions. It seems like we might need different stats for equality probes than range probes.
What about my suggestion from August 2000:
"There might be a way to side-step the issue here. I assume that
the index nodes contain a pointer to a record in a file, which
has some kind of file position. By comparing the file positions
on one leaf node, and then averaging the node cluster values,
you might be able to get a pretty good idea of the *real* clustering."I don't use the CLUSTER command, but I have clustered data and would like to be able to take advantage of the fact if possible. *If* the record pointers can be used to indicate closeness, then the same approach of randomly sampling index nodes would seem to work. Then again, maybe I don't know enough about the storage techniques...
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp.mit.edu:11371 |/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
