Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org

[Andrew Dunstan]

Dave Page wrote: -----Original Message----- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 March 2004 13:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org Isn't gforge a pgsql related project itself? So I'd suggest: www.postgresql.org -> main PostgreSQL site gforge.postgresql.org -> gforge interface site <projectname>.postgresql.org -> gforge hosted projects The problem with that approach is that our 'official' sites then get lost amongst the project sites. We need some distinction between the core project sites and other project sites - istm that a different domain is the only way to do that. (breaking previous rule) I agree. Also, the gforge people would prefer us *not* to use a name that includes gforge, because of the risk of confusion. That's how we came up with "pgfoundry" in the first place. cheers andrew