On Wednesday 24 March 2004 15:52, Tom Lane wrote: > > >> If plpgsql works OK, I say stick with it. > > > > Hmmm. I'm not very happy with plpgsql, > > I don't know where you are planning on going with this. If it's only to > be a contrib tool, it's okay to depend on plpgsql. But we couldn't > incorporate it into the base system because plpgsql isn't part of the > base system.
So Tom, are you suggesting: 1. A core in the base distribution (C / SQL) 2. command-line tool in the base distro (pg_advisor) 3. more open project (gborg?) to let people design/add tests, some of which will eventually end up in the standard set in the base distro. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
