On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 15:23, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So I would vote for Yes on SIGINT by XID, but No on SIGTERM by PID, if Tom > > thinks there will be any significant support & troubleshooting involved for > > the latter. > > So like I say, I'm hesitant to buy into supporting this without a fairly > convincing argument that it's really needed.
It doesn't necessarily have to be a SIGTERM. The goal is to get rid of unwanted idlers (connections). Could SIGINT be extended with a command telling the daemon to shutdown or rollback the transaction as requested? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
