Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > >Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > >>In particular, the front page claims that PostgreSQL is under the BSD > >>license. The problem is that there are two. > >> > >> > > > >We use the one shown in the COPYRIGHT file in the top directory of the > >source tree, which is also available for your reading pleasure by > >clicking on the "license" link on that same front page. > > > > regards, tom lane > > > > > Ok, let me explain the issue in a finer point. > > The license given in the web link you mention seems to mandate all > related work to be under the same license, which is nowhere near what > BSD means. In particular, this puts some doubt on whether I can use the > code in an LGPL project.
Where do you see that? No one else has seen that requirement before, and such a requirement doesn't exist. > Can anyone shed more light on this point for me? Am I misreading > something? If it is possible to put code into an LGPL project, what is > the requirement? None. Just don't sue us. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
