The reason we are using pl/j instead of pl/java is that the word java is protected by sun. We chose J, who knew there was a programming language called J :(
--dc-- On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 15:19, Chris Browne wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Cramer) writes: > > Pl/J is a java procedural language for postgres. We are looking for > > alpha testers to help us find bugs, and get feedback. > > > > The project can be found at > > > > http://plj.codehaus.org/ > > > > Bugs can be reported at > > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10430 > > Shouldn't PL/J be an embedding of Ken Iverson's J into PG? :-) > > <http://www.jsoftware.com/> > > (Many moons ago, I embedded READLINE into J, which made it vastly more > usable on Unix-like systems...) > > [Oh, the languages I'd like as PL/whatever... PL/I could be an > embedding of Icon; PL/J could be pretty neat; PL/CL... :-)] -- Dave Cramer 519 939 0336 ICQ # 14675561 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
