Alvaro Herrera Munoz wrote: > Personally I've been focused on getting subtransactions done and now I think > I'm very close to an acceptable patch, but what has slowed me down the last > time has been lack of feedback from core developers. It was feedback I > needed to figure out the best ways to do things (I made several big mistakes > that I'm only now correcting thanks to invaluable comments from Tom Lane), > and without it the last steps were getting very difficult to me. > Fortunately now I've got it. > > I have some confidence in that I will be able to deliver it maybe the last > week of May. I can only hope, however, that it will not be rejected because > it's presented too close to feature freeze. That would be a shame, because > I offered incremental patches a lot of time ago and they weren't even looked > at (Hey, I'm not blaming anyone).
One huge problem is that many features are asking for our attention this close to freeze date. I spend some time on relative-path installs, and now there are lots of patches that need to be reviewed and placed into the queue, and we haven't been giving you enough feedback. And I am thinking of helping with PITR because there isn't much work to do except plugging into the backend and GUC. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
