[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you can see, it takes a LOT longer. That's because the disk has to do a lot more work, the hardware data path has to carry twice as much data, and you have to manage multiple accesses to a single object, the disk.
It doesn't take much imagination to see what this would mean for pg_xlog.
Well, writing off-reality benchmarks on hardware setups I'd never suggest for db server usage proves... what?
Additionally, do you care about safety?
Regards, Andreas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
