Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > So I disagree with the premise. Measuring these things in KB is not an
> > improvement.
>
> I agree, although I think changing effective_cache_size to be measured in KB/MB
> is worth doing.
I have to say as a user the parameters that are measured in postgres blocks
are really annoying and confusing. Really really annoying and confusing.
If someone's playing with this I would suggest they should work something like
dd parameters and take a unit. So you could specify effective_cache=500k or
effective_cache=1M or effective_cache=1G or whatever unit you wanted.
And this should be true for _all_ parameters that measure space. Consistency
makes it much much easier for people to learn a new system.
--
greg
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
