Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >I believe the decision for June 1 was made around May 1. I participated > >in the discussion. Should we have made that final decision sooner? > > > > > > > > No, I think that was the right time to make a decision. Before that > things were in a great state of flux. My suggestion is that there should > be some minimum time (I suggested 6 weeks to 2 months) between when the > decision is made/announced and the actual freeze date. In the present > case we would have probably have ended up with a date very like what we > now have, but without the June 1 false start, which many (including me) > felt tried to set the date too early and gave insufficient notice to > those who wanted to make the cut.
I understand. You are saying that we couldn't set the date until May 1, but on May 1 we should have set the date farther way, like 6-8 weeks, rather than 4.5 weeks, right? On that, I certainly agree. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
