Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is why I proposed originally to keep the non-transactional behavior > for Parse messages, but transactional for SQL PREPARE. The latter can > be said to be inside the transaction and should behave like so. I think > this lowers the surprise factor.
It seems like we are closing in on an agreement that that is what should happen. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match