On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 08:38, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
> > - by time - but the time stamp on each xlog record only specifies to the
> > second, which could easily be 10 or more commits (we hope....)
> >
> > Should we use a different datatype than time_t for the commit timestamp,
> > one that offers more fine grained differentiation between checkpoints?
>
> Imho seconds is really sufficient. If you know a more precise position
> you will probably know it from backend log or an xlog sniffer. With those
> you can easily use the TransactionId way.
>
OK, thanks. I'll just leave the time_t datatype just the way it is.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
