On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 00:16, Dennis Bjorklund wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > We can later implement savepoints, which will have "SAVEPOINT foo" and > > "ROLLBACK TO foo" as interface. (Note that a subtransaction is slightly > > different from a savepoint, so we can't use ROLLBACK TO <foo> in > > subtransactions because that has a different meaning in savepoints). > > What is the semantic difference?
One is in the SQL spec? For that reason alone, we should probably eventually have the savepoint syntax work. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
