elein wrote: > FYI: I'm agreeing w/Tom who is agreeing with me. > > The tag change should be good. I do hope people are > not relying on seeing COMMIT when the transaction > rolled back. It does not seem that in this case > they would.
If it is a problem, hopefully we will hear about it during beta. I will mention is as a backward-compatibility issue in the release notes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > elein > > On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 04:13:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > As I remember, the big issue was how often applications are looking and > > > comparing these tags to take actions. I think we should return ROLLBACK > > > on COMMIT failure and we can see if we get any problem reports during > > > beta. > > > > Good enough; I'll make it happen. > > > > regards, tom lane > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
