On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:41:49AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Maybe other people want to comment on this issue.
> >
> > So far, \z and \dp have shown privileges of tables.
> >
> > Now \dn+ and \db+ show the privileges of schemas and tablespaces.
> >
> > Should we, for consistency, move the table privilege display to \dt+, or
> > should we move the schema and tablespace display to, say \zn and \zb? Or
> > maybe this is not an issue at all.
>
> Now that you mention it, it does seem nice to show permissions in \dt+.
IMHO the \dn+ output would get too wide if you do that. I'd be in favor
of using \z<letter> to display permissions of the object in \d<letter>
Something that annoys me is that the \? shows
\dt description of what it does ...
add + for more details
where it should be
\dt[+] same description
No need to say what the + does, it should be obvious.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Para tener más hay que desear menos"
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
