Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 09:49:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, at least not if you made that a global change. Doing it that way
>> will mean that a failed subtransaction will not release its locks, no?
> Hmm ... won't they be released when the ResourceOwner is released?
Er ... duh. Still stuck in pre-ResourceOwner ways of thinking ;-)
Now that I'm more awake, I recall that I actually considered changing
the lock code to take all locks in the name of the TopTransaction as
part of the ResourceOwner patch. But I decided to leave well enough
alone because I hadn't time to think about all the implications.
Yeah, if you don't see any problem, go for it.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
