Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I certainly think it's worth considering, although I see Tom has >> objected :-) . Say we have an option called FIRSTLINELABELS, then on >> copy out it would write the headings on the first line, and on copy in >> it could just ignore the first line (so it could work symmetrically).
> Yes, that is what I was thinking. Is this a TODO? Sure it can be > misused but most copy options can be similarly misused. Most copy options will result in obvious failures if misused. I dislike this one because of the high risk of silent corruption of your data (loss of a row or insertion of a row that shouldn't be there). Considering no one has even made a positive case why we should add it (for instance, a use-case where it's necessary), I don't think it belongs in the to-do list. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings