Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Reini Urban wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian schrieb: > > > >> Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> > >>> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> > >>>> There are alot of windows.h includes: > >>> > >>> > >>> ... and most of them are redundant because it is already included > >>> via c.h. > >> > >> > >> Right, but we only include windows.h in Mingw. Does Cygwin need it? > > > > > > Not really, but it will be lot of new work, which is imho not worth it. > > > > In some places the cygwin section calls WinAPI functions. > > It could be worked around by using the posix/cygwin counterparts. > > > > pgsymlink for example. > > > I'm quite certain we can avoid the problem if we are careful. But > wouldn't it be better to get rid of the problem instead by using some > other marker?
Agreed. We would never be sure we got them all and new ones didn't get added in over time. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
