On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 07:35:29PM +0200, Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> Is select a transaction starting statement according to the the sql
> specification?
Yes, at least in my copy of sql2003.
> In the specification (sql99) there is a list of things that are and a list
> of things that are not, but I can't figure out which list a select query
> belongs to. Isn't that great :-)
In SQL2003-5WD I see:
4.33.4 SQL-statements and transaction states
The following SQL-statements are transaction-initiating SQL-statements,
i.e., if there is no current SQLtransaction, and a statement of this
class is executed, an SQL-transaction is initiated:
[...]
-- The following SQL-data statements:
[...]
<direct select statement: multiple rows>.
[...]
The <direct select statement: multiple rows> is in time defined as
<cursor specification>, which in turn is a <query expression>, which is
our SELECT statement. A lot of jumps in the grammar, but it's there.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Maybe there's lots of data loss but the records of data loss are also lost.
(Lincoln Yeoh)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
