Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 04:12, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Well, see my thoughts above on differentiating SPs from Functions. I
>> certainly don't think we should be using the same table.
> Using a different system catalog strikes me as total overkill, and a
> surefire way to duplicate a lot of code.
I think that choice will be driven by one thing and one thing only: do
procedures and functions have the same primary key? Which boils down to
whether they have the same semantics about overloaded function names
and resolution of ambiguous parameter types. Personally I think I'd
prefer that they did, but plenty of people have indicated they'd rather
have other features (like defaultable parameters).
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
