Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do we want to backport tighter security for plperl? In particular, > insisting on Safe.pm >= 2.09 and removing the :base_io set of ops?
I'd vote not: 7.4.5 => 7.4.6 is not an update that people would expect
to break their plperl code ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
