>>I'm trying to modify the storage manager now. > > Um ... why?
Because I want to add my new storage manager. It is not just for (single) magnetic disk. > If anyone had wanted to add a new storage manager in the last fifteen > years, we'd doubtless have tried to clean this up some, but no one has > and I'm not really expecting anyone to try in the next fifteen... I guess clean separation and APIs are necessary for now. If one need to modify/extend a storage manager for better performance, clean design and APIs are essentials. For my purpose, I'm thinking about a pluggable storage manager mechanism using dynamic loading, because I want to develop my smgr independently from main codebase... -- NAGAYASU Satoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenSource Development Center, NTT DATA Corp. http://www.nttdata.co.jp/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
