Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Another issue is what we do with the effective_cache_size value once we have a number we trust. We can't readily change the size of the ARC lists on the fly.
Huh? I thought effective_cache_size was just used as an factor the cost estimation equation.
Today, that is true. Jan is speculating about using it as a parameter of the ARC cache management algorithm ... and that worries me.
If we need another config option, it's not that we are running out of possible names, is it?
Jan
-- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] #
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
