On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:45:22 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:29:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Wouldn't it be better to just stay in TBLOCK_STARTED state, as if the > >> COMMIT were just some random utility command? > > > It's the same thing, because CommitTransactionCommand acts identically > > either way. I changed it anyway because it seems simpler. > > Patch applied.
Many thanks for this. I appreciate it's a fairly trivial issue, but seeing the word "ROLLBACK" when a commit, or at least a non-operation were expected, can do nasty things to one's blood pressure. Ian Barwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
