Probably for a small table, where the machinery of reading the index, followed by checking the table for non-visible tuples is more costly than just scanning the table!


regards

Mark

John Hansen wrote:

Why not just change the function all together to 'select $1 from $2
order by $1 desc limit 1;'

Is there ANY situation where max(col) as it is, would be faster?

... John



---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to