In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/27/04 at 01:05 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> at 09:50 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >>> If you're hoping to get this into 8.0, it had better arrive soon and be a >>> very small patch ... >> It may have to be for 8.0.1 there are a lot of changes to the makefiles to >> accomodate the if(($portname), ibmos2) stuff and the src/port/ibmos2 code >More like 8.1, then. A not-previously-supported port is going to be seen >as a new feature, not a bug fix, especially if the changes are less than >trivial. Sounds good to me... The makefile changes are more than trivial (18 new and/or changed files) and the build environment would have to be tested on supported platforms to make sure nothing got broken. There are a few changes to the C code (28 new and/or changed files) and H files (9 new and/or changed files). So far.... :-) >> BTW - has anyone else noticed that there are a number of places where >> there is a test for HAVE_OPTRESET instead of HAVE_INT_OPTRESET? >Good catch ... that's definitely broken. Sometimes doing a new port finds problems that are not noticed otherwise. I'll just forge ahead with the OS/2 stuff and get patches ready for a post 8.0.0 GA Lorne -- ----------------------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html