> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: 27 November 2004 04:33
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: PostgreSQL Win32 port list; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] pg_autovacuum in 
> 8beta-dev3 small bug
> 
> 
> Can someone comment on this?
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> 
> Leen Besselink wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > 8.0beta3 has pg_autovacuum included, when I want to run this as a 
> > Windows service, it says you can use the -I and -R options.
> > 
> > When I do that and I specify a password with '-P' 
> (uppercase) then in 
> > the registry it's saved as '-p' (lowercase) in the 
> service-commandline 
> > (ImagePath).

This was fixed in v1.21 of pg_autovacuum.c, That rev is tagged for
beta3, so you should not be seeing this issue unless you actually have
an older version for some reason.

http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/contrib/pg_autovacuum/p
g_autovacuum.c.diff?r1=1.20;r2=1.21;f=h

> > Also it removes the quotes I added and I'm not so sure it 
> would work 
> > the way it's supposed to, without it.

It's not so much that it strips them (that happens automagically), more
that it doesn't re-add them when it writes the command line in the
registry. The attached patch fixes that by simply quoting all options
that may need it.

> > If you add DependOnService (a REG_MULTI_SZ an 
> array-like-thingie) and 
> > have the name (in this case: pgsql-8.0-beta2-dev3) of a service it 
> > depends on, it will not fail to start (it will not even try, as 
> > PostgreSQL is not running), when PostgreSQL already failed.
> > 
> > Maybe it's an idea to specify it on the commandline (what 
> service to 
> > depend on).

A -E <service> option is added in the attached patch.

Regards, Dave.

Attachment: pg_autovacuum.diff
Description: pg_autovacuum.diff

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to