On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:33:18 +0000, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:02:41AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 12:49:46 +0000, > > Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > This is a perpetual problem, if people all used the same MUA and > > > (assuming it has the capability) all used the 'reply to list' command > > > to reply to the list everything would be wonderful! :-) > > > > I think using mail-followup-to is better than having people do reply to > > list. > > > It depends on how the 'reply to list' is implemented surely. With > mutt (the MUA I use) you specify the addresses of known mailing lists > and the 'reply to List' command uses this to detect from the headers > whether the mail is from a list or not and acts accordingly.
That doesn't work in general since the client can't know which recipients are actually on the list. However mutt does utilize mail-followup-to headers when doing group replies and that works well for replying to lists. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
