On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 02:21 -0500, Greg Stark wrote: > "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > John wanted us to allow use of the 'locale' and 'utf8' pragmas in trusted > > code. > > You know, there's something twisted in postgres's naming scheme here. How is > it that "trusted" languages the ones that need a sandbox? and "untrusted" > languages the ones that get to run amok without restrictions? > > I would have thought it would be the other way around.
It's not that you trust the language, it that you trust the PostgreSQL despite the language. -- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
