Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I'm sorry if I offended you. > > As for suggestions, elsewhere you wrote: > > "Now, if I don't understand the patch, we can change the procedure so I > require someone to state it is OK rather than the fallback of quiet > acceptance, especially just before a beta or RC version." > > > Take that as my suggested improvement.
Yes, that is what I am thinking, though I am hoping someone who understands encodings will take ownership of all those patches like Peter did with translations. If I don't understand it even simple things can go wrong with patch application. > Keep up the good work as always - you know we are grateful for it. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
