=?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Zara?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le 23 d=E9c. 04, =E0 00:26, Tom Lane a =E9crit : >> Looks reasonable to me --- why do you call it only a "semi" fix
> Because strtod really should underflow, so there seems to be a bug in > NetBSD's strtod. > So this is just accepting the bug, not correcting it :) Sure, but it's not our job to fix strtod(). Feel free to file a bug report with the NetBSD guys. >> I wonder whether we oughtn't remove the i.86- part from the patterns >> for the BSDen, ie, assume they will have this behavior on all hardware >> not just Intel. > From pgbuildfarm, it seems that openBSD sparc64 does not exhibit the > problem (it's not part of resultmap, and passes the float8 test). OK, never mind that then. Patch applied as-is. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend