> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:09:42 -0500, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This time setlocale() was needed to get the behaviour > > > I needed (database initdb'ed to 'C', my order set to 'pl_PL', > > > or whatever locale I need at given moment). > > I would imagine that the performance is spectacularly awful :-(. > > Have you benchmarked it? A large sort on a unitext column, > > for instance, would be revealing.
Why do you persist in believing this? I sent timing results of doing a setlocale for every record here about a year ago. Sorting on the pg_strxfrm I posted (and Conway rewrote) was about twice as slow as sorting without using it. So it's slow but not spectacularly awful. This depends on having a good setlocale implementation, but glibc at least seems to be satisfactory. -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])